weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) (09/21/88)
In article <1632@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>, gilbert@cs (Gilbert Cockton) writes: >>Perhaps Gilbert Cockton could clarify the ontological status of "Science" >> for us (:-). >There are two sciences: > 1) the activity of people who call themselves scientists > 2) the intellectual artefact of philosophers/philosophisers etc. This and the resurrected "free will vs determinism vs quantum mechanics" debate are probably more appropriate to sci.philosophy.tech. ucbvax!garnet!weemba Matthew P Wiener/Brahms Gang/Berkeley CA 94720
gilbert@cs.glasgow.ac.uk (Gilbert Cockton) (09/23/88)
In article <14572@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> weemba@garnet.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) writes: >This and the resurrected "free will vs determinism vs quantum mechanics" >debate are probably more appropriate to sci.philosophy.tech. ... and alt.weemba.sheep, and alt.flame.weemba, and alt.weemba.flame, but especially uk.yb-users! :-) -- Gilbert Cockton, Department of Computing Science, The University, Glasgow gilbert@uk.ac.glasgow.cs <europe>!ukc!glasgow!gilbert