peru@soleil.UUCP (Dave Peru) (10/21/88)
There's something missing from figure 18 on p.71 of "Godel, Escher, Bach ..." by Douglas R. Hofstadter.
smoliar@vaxa.isi.edu (Stephen Smoliar) (10/26/88)
In article <439@soleil.UUCP> peru@soleil.UUCP (Dave Peru) writes: >There's something missing from figure 18 on p.71 of >"Godel, Escher, Bach ..." by Douglas R. Hofstadter. Since you probably don't mean "a sensible approach to illustration," I would argue that the Figure doesn't amount to much unless it allocates space to the rules of inference. (Or do you regard them as involately static as Bach's greatness?)