dg1v+@andrew.cmu.edu (David Greene) (01/24/89)
>>(Stevan Harnad): >> ... >> No symbol grounding theory (including my own) -- at least no ... >(Greg Lee) Except that even Schlick allows grounding in *possible* experiences, >I see no notable differences from your views. For a recent argument No! Please! Not the symbol grounding debate! AAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lee@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Greg Lee) (01/26/89)
From article <8Xr5ley00jbbA4EUZ7@andrew.cmu.edu>, by dg1v+@andrew.cmu.edu (David Greene): " ... " AAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In consideration of the good nature I think I see behind this dispairing cry, I'd like to thank you all for your patience with these philosophical/psychological/linguistic tangents. Greg, lee@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu
cam@edai.ed.ac.uk (Chris Malcolm) (01/27/89)
In article <8Xr5ley00jbbA4EUZ7@andrew.cmu.edu> dg1v+@andrew.cmu.edu (David Greene) writes: >>>(Stevan Harnad): >>> ... >>> No symbol grounding theory (including my own) -- at least no >... >>(Greg Lee) Except that even Schlick allows grounding in *possible* experiences, >>I see no notable differences from your views. For a recent argument > > >No! Please! Not the symbol grounding debate! > >AAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh Goody! The symbol grounding debate again! Let's have less noise this time from the back row, eh? Chris Malcolm Department of Artificial Intelligence