[comp.ai] What is the sound made by a mind?

caasi@sdsu.UUCP (Richard Caasi) (04/23/89)

                     What is the Sound Made by a Mind?


      The goals of Artificial Intelligence are beyond the capabilities

      of Turing machines, i.e., conventional computers aren't going to

      solve AI's biggest problems.  All  isn't  lost,  however,  since

      there is at least one class of machines more pwerful than Turing

      machines.  Existence proof - the human brain.  We've been trying

      to  simulate  the  mind with the wrong models!  For example, the

      mind can solve Turing non-computable functions.  In  fact  there

      are  classes  of  abstract machines more powerful then the human

      brain in computational power.  Let us refer to the aggregate  of

      these  classes as Super-intelligence.  The human brain continues

      to evolve making our attempts to assign constants to it  absurd.

      Imagine  an  IQ  test given to prehistoric man, present-day man,

      and 25th century man.  What  we  define  as  intelligence  today

      would be obsolete by future standards.  So why should our models

      stop here?



           Scientists try to model the universe with simplistic models

      that  have  been  designed  to  accommodate  the  limitations of

      present-day human minds.   Funny  thing  is,  we  believe  these

      models as reality itself!  It's no wonder that these models come

      and go with the times.   Old  models  become  passe',  new  ones

      become  chic,  those  on the fringe await their turn, all taxing

      the conservative wheels of scientific progress.



           What is computation but a transformation from one state  to

      another.   Such  functions  can  be  discrete,  continuous,  and

      non-linear but nature performs  these  transformations  all  the

      time.  Energy is information.  Its transformation from one state

      to  another  is  computation.    Entropy   and   evolution   are

      computational  processes.   We  can't  even  solve  most  of the

      non-linear  differential  equations  we  use  to  describe  most

      processes  in  nature.  In the most abstract sense, the universe

      IS a computational mechanism, a computer running itself  (not  a

      model  of  itself).  It has no need for symbolic representations

      since everything in  nature  is  its  own  representation.   Its

      program  is  dynamically evolving according to its own rules and

      the computation will end, presumably, with the heat death of the

      universe  (i.e.,  no more energy to transform or in other words,

      no more data to compute).



           Man and his feeble brain is part of the universe and  plays

      a role in nature's program.  (Yes man and his artifacts are also

      as much a part of the ecosystem as are plants and  animals.)  As

      Heisenberg  imples,  we have an effect on nature's process.  And

      we are in turn affected by it in endless  feedback  loops.   The

      interdependence   of   nature  is  apparent  in  its  "sensitive

      dependence to initial conditions".  Man's objectivity, like  his

      free  will,  is  merely  an  illusion  but  his  actions do have

      consequences.

     |================================================================|
     |Richard Caasi              || In art, as in everywhere else, the|
     |San Diego State University || the process of creating is more   |
     |sdsu!caasi@ucsd.edu        || important than the product of the |
     |============================= process.==========================|

     Disclaimer:  Opinions are never independent of each other.