[comp.ai] Mercury?

davel@cbnewsl.att.com (David Loewenstern) (01/05/91)

Has anyone heard of an expert system shell/development environment
called Mercury, by Artificial Intelligence Technologies?  What are
your impressions of either the product or the company?

These opinions are shareware.  If you like the product,
please send your $0.02 to
               David Loewenstern
   {backbone!}att!whutt!davel which is davel@whutt.att.com

jgronosk@x102c.harris-atd.com (gronosky jeffrey 33064) (01/07/91)

In article <1991Jan5.040204.4600@cbnewsl.att.com> davel@cbnewsl.att.com (David Loewenstern) writes:
>
>Has anyone heard of an expert system shell/development environment
>called Mercury, by Artificial Intelligence Technologies?
>
	I have heard of it through another representative in our company.
>
>What are your impressions of either the product or the company?
>
	He said that the demonstration of the Mercury system he saw was based
	solely on the fact that they thought they were better then Gensym's G2
	Expert System. He was disappointed that their demonstration was based on
	"Gensym Bashing" rather than the capabilities of their system. As a
	result he attended a G2 training course to better understand the
	capabilities of G2.

Questions for you.
	We are currently using Gensym's G2 Expert System. Due to time
	constraints were not able to fully research the market
	for other competators products. Have you or anyone else compared
	compared Gensym G2 or R*Time expert systems with Mercury's expert
	system shell? If so what were your thoughts/feelings? I'm also
	interested in any responses that you receive which compare the
	previoulsly mentioned systems or mention any other systems that
	offer the similar functionality.

		Good luck,

			Jeff Gronosky

		jgronosk@x102c.ess.harris.com

mikeb@wdl31.wdl.loral.com (Michael H Bender) (01/08/91)

With regard to Mercury and Gensym -- I have used neither so obviously I am
an expert and can thrown my opinion in (who knows -- it may even be worth 2
cents!). In the past I have looked at both systems (superficially) And here
is the conclusion I arrived at at the time:

They are designed for different classes of applications. Gensym seems to be
oriented towards model-based reasoning whereas Mercury is a more typical
expert-system shell. In other words, if I had to build a knowledge-based
system based on a physical/mechanical system, I would definitely use
Gensym. However if I had to build an inferencing system that used frames,
forward chaining, and backward chaining, I would look towards Mercury
first. 

Mike Bender