pab@cbterra.ATT.COM (Mannequin Man) (09/17/87)
In article <341@ddsw1.UUCP>, era@ddsw1.UUCP (Mark Ethan Smith) writes: > In article <1554@chinet.UUCP> rhonda@chinet.UUCP (Rhonda Scribner) writes: > >>>Gene has tried to make this into a political argument, claiming that the > >>>issue is "libertarianism." > > > How interesting. > > It is totally irrelevant that the people who censored me and harassed > me and eventually succeeded in getting my password pulled on the Well > and on Chinet were mostly Libertarians and that I happen to be Jewish. > Yes it is totally irrelevant. Since we're talking about personal exp., The people who have physically assaulted me were socialist liberals and I happen to be Catholic. What does this prove? NOTHING!! yeah, maybe we can try to get away from the infantile argument style so many people use on the net. Where'd you learn it, the 3rd grade play ground? "is too" "is not" what fun! Now see, my last two sentences were quite immature, they're examples. Let's try to stamp out this stupidity. > It is only a coincidence that the only people who get their passwords ^^^^ The error in this statement should be obvious. > pulled by usenet sites happen to be Jewish, and that the people who do it > happen to be Libertarians who, except in the case of Jews, pretend to Another error. Why do you continue making these bigoted and false statements? > advocate "absolute free speech." Libertarians and most people agree that you have freedom of speech in that no one else has to provide you with a soapbox, magaphone, and know one has to listen to or agree with what you say. The day you support the KKK's "right to free speech" on your property, in your dwelling, with you footing the bill i'll even say you can be rational with your version of freedom of speech. About you getting your passwd pulled: Would you want to foot the bill for a weeks worth of your postings, how about Colin Jenkins? 2nd, since you post so often you also cost sites a lot of money, would you want to pay the 10 grand it takes to post a bunch of Charlie's articles? You know very little about libertarians do you?, i suggest you find the archives of mod.politics, if there are any, and read them. > > I certainly wouldn't be paranoid enough to see any discrimination in this. I certainly wouldn't be paranoid enough to see any bigotry in your articles. > > Definitely a non-issue. But if you happen to be Jewish, I'd advise you > to try to get accounts on machines that aren't owned or dominated by > Libertarians--just to be on the safe side. ;-) > I wont even bother to make a cheap analogy, If i posted the most repulsive MCP attack on women that ever existed, say to rec.sf-lovers, and placed a smilie after it i'm sure you would yell and scream. ( i chose sf-lovers becaue it has nothing to do with the topic, the same as most of the newsgroups this "debate" has been posted to. ) If you want to argue about libertarianism go mail an article to the soc.politics moderator. Soc.politics is the only place to argue on the net. In talk.politics-misc people just "yell", make wild accusations, and infer things into people's postings. All questions asked in this article were rhetorical. > --Mark > -- > > Poster assumes all liability for contents of this article. > Mark Ethan Smith ihnp4!ddsw1!era I didnt even use gender specific pronouns ( and wont since you are offended )
eugene@aurora.UUCP (Eugene miya) (09/18/87)
A simple polite request: Could all discussants please remove soc.net-people from Ngroups. --enm