[news.misc] The Continuing Crisis

bbh@whizz.uucp (Bud Hovell) (12/09/88)

In article <680@fcs280s.ncifcrf.gov>, shore@ncifcrf.gov (Melinda Shore) writes:
> into a) assimilating, or b) shutting up.  And personally, I find speaking
> out against oppressive behavior admirable, not objectionable.
> -- 
> Melinda Shore                                    shore@ncifcrf.gov

Me, too. I'm also in favor of motherhood, the flag, and apple pie. But the 
entire issue here hinges on the issue of *whether* a joke which relies upon
racial, religious, or sexual references is, per se, "discriminatory" or, in
your more forceful terms, "oppressive".

Is Don Rickles a "racist"? Well, is he?

Whether one likes his humor or not, Mr. Rickles has never - so far as I know -
drawn serious fire from the Jewish or Black or Puerto Rican or Polish or other
communities like unto what we are witnessing here. I can't recall a single
instance in which he has been accused of "racism". (It may have happened, but
I just don't recall it - does anyone else?). 

How cum? Does he have some kinda special permit issued by the "right people"?
How does one go about applying? Is there a fee? If so, I'll pitch in to help,
since I do think we should all be most concerned if one of our usenet
moderators were actually guilty of practicing humor without a license. Shame!
 
                                                      OVERTURE SYSTEMS CORP. 
                       Bud Hovell                     Operations Specialists
                                                      Lake Oswego, Oregon
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: USENET: {attmail! | tektronix!tessi!bucket! | pacbell!safari!} whizz!bbh :
: TELEX: 152258436 (Whizz/Bud Hovell)                  VOICE: 503-636-3000 :
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                   "Follow your bliss" - Joseph Campbell

rfarris@serene.UUCP (Rick Farris) (12/12/88)

In article <567@whizz.uucp> bbh@whizz.uucp (Bud Hovell) writes:

` Whether one likes his humor or not, Mr. Rickles has never - so far as
` I know drawn serious fire from the Jewish or Black or Puerto Rican or
` Polish or other communities like unto what we are witnessing here.
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^

I think that is the key word: "communities."  I don't think JEDR and
his 3 (or 4 or 5) henchmen/henchwomen qualify as a community.  In
fact, I've seen more minorities post here that they find the jokes to
be non-racist, than vice versa.

"A Tempest in a Teapot", or "Much Ado About Nothing", or even "JEDR's
15 Minutes of Fame" is my description of this phenomena.
-- 
Rick Farris   RF Engineering  POB M  Del Mar, CA  92014   voice (619) 259-6793
rfarris@serene.cts.com     ...!uunet!serene!rfarris       serene.UUCP 259-7757

ptownson@bu-cs.BU.EDU (Patrick Townson) (12/12/88)

In article <567@whizz.uucp> bbh@whizz.uucp (Bud Hovell) writes:
>Is Don Rickles a "racist"? Well, is he?
>
>Whether one likes his humor or not, Mr. Rickles has never - so far as I know -
>drawn serious fire from the Jewish or Black or Puerto Rican or Polish or other
>communities like unto what we are witnessing here. I can't recall a single
>instance in which he has been accused of "racism". (It may have happened, but
>I just don't recall it - does anyone else?). 
>
>How cum? Does he have some kinda special permit issued by the "right people"?
>How does one go about applying? Is there a fee? If so, I'll pitch in to help,
>since I do think we should all be most concerned if one of our usenet
>moderators were actually guilty of practicing humor without a license. Shame!
> 

No, Don Rickles is not a racist. And to answer your second question about 
'permits issued by the right people', unfortunatly this is correct. What 
happens is when people run out of any other excuse for stopping your speech or
your legitimate activities -- if they had any valid reasons to begin with --
well, then they just scream 'racist!'  or 'anti-semite!!!'

You see, the thinking is that these two conditions -- racism and anti-semitism
-- are so awful, so ugly, that *everything* has to take a back seat to getting
rid of them. Indeed, these are pretty dreadful ways to organize your thoughts
about people, but they are not the worst problems we face in the world.

I've always felt the true racists and jew-haters are the people who scream the
most about it. To quote a line from Shakespeare, 'methinks the man doth protest
too loudly...'

Long ago I quit guilt-tripping to the tune of 'racism' and 'anti-semitism'. 
Like the words 'liberal' and 'conservative' relative to modern American
politics, they are now virtually meaningless. When people toss these words
around at people like Brad T. and others, what they are really saying is they
can't think of any legitimate reason for their attitude and they are hoping you
will buy this one. What they are hoping is that you will recoil in horror and
stop the world while they get off.

And who are the 'right people who issue the permits'? If people in the news
media like you, then you've got it made. If they do not like you, then try as
hard as you wish to explain things in the proper context -- such as the
operations of this net relative to the *tiny* piece which makes up rec.funny,
but they will not be placated. When you have racism on the brain -- when the
differences between black and white, Christian and Jew, male and female are
so familiar to you that almost all your time is occupied thinking about it,
then nothing is going to convince you otherwise. 

Unfortunatly, some newspapers, some television/radio people are like that. The
notion of racism so consumes them and fills them with anxiety that they find 
a story about it everywhere. They say, 'this will be our news' and then set
about finding it, as obviously happened when Brad Templeton was so badly
victimized recently. Add in the general ignorance of the public about computer
communications -- and I will suggest the general hostility of the print media
toward a growing pheonenom which is effectivly leaving fewer people to read 
the papers or listen to the talking heads on their television at night -- and
'racism' is just the tool to use.

So when someone shouts 'racism' or 'anti-semite' at you, just laugh at them
and go on your way. *You* know these allegations are not true, and so do 
they most of the time.

Patrick Townson

jwm@aplvax.jhuapl.edu (Jim Meritt) (12/17/88)

In article <567@whizz.uucp> bbh@whizz.uucp (Bud Hovell) writes:
}Me, too. I'm also in favor of motherhood, the flag, and apple pie. But the 
}entire issue here hinges on the issue of *whether* a joke which relies upon
}racial, religious, or sexual references is, per se, "discriminatory" or, in
}your more forceful terms, "oppressive".
}
}Is Don Rickles a "racist"? Well, is he?
}
}Whether one likes his humor or not, Mr. Rickles has never - so far as I know -
}drawn serious fire from the Jewish or Black or Puerto Rican or Polish or other
}communities like unto what we are witnessing here. I can't recall a single
}instance in which he has been accused of "racism". (It may have happened, but
}I just don't recall it - does anyone else?). 
}
}How cum? Does he have some kinda special permit issued by the "right people"?
}How does one go about applying? Is there a fee? If so, I'll pitch in to help,
}since I do think we should all be most concerned if one of our usenet
}moderators were actually guilty of practicing humor without a license. Shame!

How about 'cause it's his job, and designated as "entertainment", and is
understood as not personal attack?  He is fairly polite when not on stage,
and issues appologies to whoever says they are offended.

Personally, he irritates the hell out of me, but nobody is forcing me to
listen, so I don't.


Disclaimer:  "It's mine!  All mine!!!"   
					- D. Duck

bbh@whizz.uucp (Bud Hovell) (12/21/88)

In article <2734@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu>, jwm@aplvax.jhuapl.edu (Jim Meritt) writes:

> In article <567@whizz.uucp> bbh@whizz.uucp (Bud Hovell) writes:
> }Is Don Rickles a "racist"? Well, is he?

> How about 'cause it's his job, and designated as "entertainment", and is
> understood as not personal attack?  He is fairly polite when not on stage,
> and issues appologies to whoever says they are offended.

Fine - should we call for a vote and determine whether the 'job' of the 
rec.humor group moderator is to select jokes for publishment on usenet? 

Like I said, who issues the license? 

I think, too, that there is a body of people well-marked in this society who
have a strong personal need for being "offended". What distuinguishes them is
not the particularly viewpoint they maintain, but rather the militancy with
which they uphold it - and which they fully expect every other "right-thinking"
person to militantly uphold also. Include among these the wacky right, the
wacky left, and vehement {anti-smokers | women's-libbers | UFOers | safety-
nazies | et cetera ad infinitum ad nauseum}. Interestingly, they often tend
to be very fond of "statistics" of one sort or another to "prove" to the
rest of us that we don't really understand the big problem they have been
wise enough to perceive. Listen carefully, and you will find them (selectively)
quoting numbers to "prove" how wronged they are.

I tell you, the minute you hear someone start spouting statistics to support 
his/her particular social agenda, head for the door! Mark Twain was right in
saying that there were three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
I used to believe this was just a cute piece of wit by ol' Mark. Now, I think
he had a pretty solid point.

And, man, you talk about RIGHTEOUS! When these folks go into their act, then 
no holds are barred, no statement is too extreme, no insult too grave. You get
in their way, and they are going to walk right up your back, take you to court,
and in every other way display their absolute contempt for any view or behavior
which questions the rightness of theirs. And the newspapers, in particular, just
love it. Along with the lawyers.

People who tilt windmills are fairly amusing. People who *build* windmills so
they can have something to publicly tilt are boors.

> Personally, he irritates the hell out of me, but nobody is forcing me to
> listen, so I don't.

Me, too. But I don't have any problem with the fact that some people find him
amusing, and not necessarily because they are particularly "racist".
 
                                                      OVERTURE SYSTEMS CORP. 
                       Bud Hovell                     Operations Specialists
                                                      Lake Oswego, Oregon
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
: USENET: {attmail! | tektronix!tessi!bucket! | pacbell!safari!} whizz!bbh :
: TELEX: 152258436 (Whizz/Bud Hovell)                  VOICE: 503-636-3000 :
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
                   "Follow your bliss" - Joseph Campbell