shor@sphinx.uchicago.edu (Melinda Shore) (04/17/87)
[] So far I've received three newgroup messages for comp.os.fidonet, and three rmgroup messages as well. They haven't been interleaved in a particularly logical order, either. What's the gospel on comp.os.fidonet? -- Melinda Shore ..!ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!shor University of Chicago Computation Center shor@sphinx.uchicago.edu
dpz@paul.RUTGERS.EDU (David P. Zimmerman) (04/18/87)
> From: shor@sphinx.uchicago.edu (Melinda Shore) > So far I've received three newgroup messages for comp.os.fidonet, and > three rmgroup messages as well. They haven't been interleaved in a > particularly logical order, either. What's the gospel on > comp.os.fidonet? The beef is that some news adminstrators are having a field day with newgroup messages that they shouldn't be. Fidonet's group is comp.org.fidonet, since it is much more of an organization than an operating system. dpz -- David P. Zimmerman rutgers!dpz dpz@rutgers.eduE