[news.admin] Expires on OtherRealms

chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) (07/30/87)

In two days, I've already seen over 70K of material on this subject. That is
equivalent to a single issue of OtherRealms.  This is a classic case of the
cure being worse than the disease.  Rather than let this turn into a
multi-megabyte flame event, I want to let everyone know that the results are
already clear, and so I would like to suggest that everyone be quiet and
stop wasting net bandwidth.

I've seen three negative responses to the Expires.  I've also seen at
least fifteen positive responses (I stopped counting, frankly).  So if
you're looking at this as a vote, the Expires wins by at least a 5-1 margin.

As far as I'm concerned, I'll continue to use the Expires line as long as
I'm convinced it is an advantage to do so (for OtherRealms and the net) and
not a problem. Any system administrator who does not agree with me with this
position is welcome to add OtherRealms to their early expiration list or to
stop carrying the newsgroup entirely -- that's your right as an
administrator. Since OtherRealms is now quarterly, I'll be setting the
expiration date to between two and a half and three months, so that the old
issue will (hopefully) expire shortly before the new issue is distributed.

Thanks for all the feedback, both positive and negative.  Constructive
criticism is always welcome (just very rare on this network)

chuq
Chuq Von Rospach	chuq@sun.COM		Delphi: CHUQ

We live and learn, but not the wiser grow -- John Pomfret (1667-1703)