[news.admin] Gross abuse of the Net: "Send Dollar" postings return

mcb@tis.llnl.gov (Michael C. Berch) (05/26/88)

[Re articles posted by JJ@cup.portal.com soliciting funds for personal use]

In article <2530@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
> 	I will leave as an execise to the reader to consider the possible
> legal implications of using interstate communications ("by wire") to
> solicit the sending of money "by mail" to a blind post office box, no less.
> And we don't even have the real name of the alleged impoverished student.

and in article <3647@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> max@eros.UUCP (Max Hauser) writes:
> [...]
> Well, this person is transmitting a plea throughout at least the United
> States for mailed money and is stipulating explicit purposes to which it
> would be put.  Therefore, in contrast to many Usenet gambits that are 
> merely obnoxious, JJ's would seem to fall within the purview of the US 
> fraud-by-wire and other federal statutes, and therefore eligible for the 
> attention of the US Department of Justice, including the FBI.  Any eager
> young D-o-J attorneys out there who might want to take it and run with it?

First of all, I quite agree that the articles represent a gross abuse
of the net, and sent a strong letter to root@cup.portal.com and
usenet@cup.portal.com, neither of which has been answered (though I
understand that Portal has yanked "JJ"'s account.  Some of you may
remember when a similar situation arose when multiple articles
were posted by a garyt@ihlpa.ATT.COM a few weeks ago containing a bizarre
commercial announcement about a weight-loss plan to a large number of
inappropriate newsgroups.

That aside, I wonder as a legal matter whether US federal mail fraud/wire 
fraud statutes would or should apply to the solicitation of funds for
personal purposes across state lines.  Assuming for the purposes of
argument that "JJ" is in fact a student, what law has been violated?
I do not believe that it presently is, or should be, a crime to solicit 
funds except where the solicitor makes fraudulent misrepresentations in
connection with the solicitation (e.g., claiming to be a charity,
falsely claiming that the donor will receive valuable consideration,
etc.) or where the solicitation involves trespassing, breach of the
peace, etc. (as in anti-panhandling laws).

Anybody have a learned opinion on this?

Michael C. Berch 
mcb@tis.llnl.gov / {ames,ihnp4,lll-crg,lll-lcc,mordor}!lll-tis!mcb