[news.admin] How can PORTAL afford all this traffic? SUN may be paying for it...

werner@utastro.UUCP (Werner Uhrig) (09/21/88)

I had noticed quite a while ago, that all the mail (sometimes large files)
I receive from PORTAL comes through SUN, even replies
to mail I had sent there (mostly through UUNET).

I did not feel that this was right as PORTAL is a $-site and I felt that they
should be using UUNET and pay for it.

I felt net-ethically bound to inform the SUN-postmaster of what (might be
going on without his knowledge) could be a large burden on his site, but he
does not seem to care (is my impression);  he never responded nor seems to
have done anything about it, best that I can tell (but I made sure that
the information reached someone at SUN), so I must assume that the traffic
is ok with SUN (if they are willing to be MX-forwarder, let's assume they
thought about it and, probably, are monitoring the situation).

Personally, I approve of public access sites and have no particular
problem with their existence, and even defend them on social grounds;
I even consider admiring SUN for helping to make PORTAL a viable enterprise...

However, I also think that site-news-administrators have a duty to worry
about both volume and contents of news-articles (as well as volume of
mail-traffic) they pass on to the sites down-stream, and, if you feel that
you have questions or complaints to make, they should be responsive to
these - but do remember, that comments, requests, or complaints made in
an "unfriendly" tone are not likely to achieve the desired result.

Personally, I am inclined to assume that the administrators at both SUN
and PORTAL are as hard-working and conderned about the net as anyone;
so why not take the matter up with them?

-- 
--------------------> PREFERED-RETURN-ADDRESS-FOLLOWS <---------------------
(ARPA)	    werner@rascal.ics.utexas.edu   (Internet: 128.83.144.1)
(INTERNET)     werner%rascal.ics.utexas.edu@cs.utexas.edu
(UUCP)	..!utastro!werner   or  ..!uunet!rascal.ics.utexas.edu!werner