netnews@pikes.Colorado.EDU (Robert M. Sklar) (03/14/89)
Please disregard any further discussion regarding Comp.internet and comp. internet.addr. The general census is NOT to have such a group or groups as the comp.protocols.tcp-ip group covers much of the discussion and most sites seem to be running the name-server. For those who replies, I thank you for your prompt replies and input. Thank You, -- Robert M. Sklar - Network News Administrator @ CU-Denver UUCP: {whatever}!boulder!pikes!netnews rsklar@pikes.colorado.edu CSN: netnews@pikes.Colorado.EDU BITNET: netnews@cudenver.BITNET ***** Ignore These Four Words *****
lmb@vicom.COM (Larry Blair) (03/15/89)
In article <2082@pikes.Colorado.EDU> netnews@pikes.Colorado.EDU (Usenet News) writes:
=Please disregard any further discussion regarding Comp.internet and comp.
=internet.addr. The general census is NOT to have such a group or groups
=as the comp.protocols.tcp-ip group covers much of the discussion and most
=sites seem to be running the name-server.
I would like to point out that if there had been a period of discussion
before calling for the vote, the point would have been made then and the
vote never would have taken place. How can you have a vote on an undiscussed
issue?
--
Larry Blair ames!vsi1!lmb lmb@vicom.com
jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) (03/15/89)
In article <1565@vicom.COM>, lmb@vicom.COM (Larry Blair) writes: > > How can you have a vote on an undiscussed > issue? It must be easy - it happens every second November. Jeff Daiell -- "Why can't they be like *we* were -- perfect in every way? What's the matter with kids today?" From "Bye, Bye Birdie"