jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) (03/30/89)
I think all the proposals for making it harder to start groups,
and easier to delete them, are going in the wrong direction.
I propose:
(1) For creation:
(A) A simple majority of 'yes' votes, or
(B) 100 yes votes regardless of the number of no votes.
(2) For deletion:
No net-wide deletion; deletion should be up to individual
users and administrators.
Para un Tejas Libre,
Jeff Daiell
--
Fiat Justitia, Ruat Caelum jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) (03/30/89)
In article <3618@ficc.uu.net>, I wrote: > > > I propose: > > (1) For creation: > > (A) A simple majority of 'yes' votes, or > (B) 100 yes votes regardless of the number of no votes. > Let me clarify: I meant a group should be created if it met either of those criteria. Para un Tejas Libre, Jeff Daiell -- Fiat Justitia, Ruat Caelum
vnend@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (D. W. James) (04/06/89)
In article <3618@ficc.uu.net> jeffd@ficc.uu.net (jeff daiell) writes:
)I think all the proposals for making it harder to start groups,
)and easier to delete them, are going in the wrong direction.
)(1) For creation:
) (A) A simple majority of 'yes' votes, or
) (B) 100 yes votes regardless of the number of no votes.
So a 2-1 vote forms a group? :-)
(or even a 1-0?????)
)Jeff Daiell
--
Later Y'all, Vnend Ignorance is the mother of adventure.
SCA event list? Mail? Send to:vnend@phoenix.princeton.edu or vnend@pucc.bitnet
Anonymous posting service (NO FLAMES!) at vnend@ms.uky.edu
Love is wanting to keep more than one person happy.