dww@stl.stc.co.uk (David Wright) (07/22/89)
In article <4354@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes: #In article <6799@pyrnj.uucp>, romain@pyrnj.uucp (Romain Kang) writes: #> Or is it time to ...make the fifty-odd inet groups regular Usenet groups? # #Do something about comp.soft-sys, first. There's nothing wrong with the #name comp.sys.andrew. You and I agree completely on this, but it appears that now the name comp.soft-sys.andrew exists as a 'real' group, the vast majority of the net doesn't care a **** about our view that the name should have been comp.sys.andrew, and the only person who does care disagrees with us. Having counted the number of X's in comp.X.*, I suspect that it is now too late to bring order into them. As for the inet groups - let them all come. I don't even know which are inet and which are Usenet any more. Regards, "None shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity" David Wright STL, London Road, Harlow, Essex CM17 9NA, UK dww@stl.stc.co.uk <or> ...uunet!mcvax!ukc!stl!dww <or> PSI%234237100122::DWW