tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) (10/14/89)
In <42@prosys.se> news@prosys.se (news) writes:
news> Control: newgroup comp.hypercube
news> Approved: news@prosys.se
news> Massively parallel systems: hardware & software. (Moderated)
Could someone please identify this group for me, and perhaps its
status as a netwide group? I don't have it in lib/newsgroups or
lib/active (well, _now_ it's in active), and I don't see it mentioned
in Gene's lists of the "normal" USENET and the inet distribution. I
was going to post an rmgroup for it because it came in with all the
other errors that news@prosys.se made and I thought the group was
comp.sys.hypercube. There is, however, no *.hypercube group at all in
any of the lists I have. Should a global rmgroup go out?
Dave
--
(setq mail '("tale@pawl.rpi.edu" "tale@itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) (10/17/89)
I've now seen three people on the net question the validity of this
group, but I've seen no replies. Could someone please comment (and
preferably send the rmgroup, as I expect it needs) as to whether it
went through the newsgroup creation guidelines. Maybe Gene or Greg or
Chuq could send the rmgroup if it is indeed bogus.
--
(setq mail '("tale@pawl.rpi.edu" "tale@itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))woods@ncar.ucar.edu (Greg Woods) (10/17/89)
In article <1989Oct17.045353.1921@rpi.edu> tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) writes: >I've now seen three people on the net question the validity of this >group, but I've seen no replies. >Maybe Gene or Greg or >Chuq could send the rmgroup if it is indeed bogus. The group was in my active file, but I had no moderator address for it. So I didn't *know* if it was bogus or not. But Gene has just sent around an rmgroup for it, so I have removed it on my system. hypercube postings should go to comp.parallel --Greg