[news.admin] earthquake

bstempleton@watmath.waterloo.edu (Brad Templeton) (10/20/89)

In article <2030@prune.bbn.com> rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>BOF in June Usenix was that it is not appropriate to send the "biz" group
>over the NSFNet backbone.

While there is certainly some material in 'biz' that would violate the
policy the NSF is likely to formulate on NSFnet, I doubt that what is
in biz.clarinet.sample would qualify.   I don't put any ads there, just
stand-alone news.  It's not even like demo software that isn't useful until
you buy something else or shareware where you are obligated to pay after
using -- it's just there with no strings.   The only thing that's
commercial about it is the fact that some people, after reading it, might
decide they want to subscribe full time.  I can't see that as against
anybody's policies.


In fact, if it weren't for the fact that group creation on usenet is
such a pain-in-the-butt flamewar these days, I would create it as
a misc subgroup or something.  (Although the prevailing hierarchy of
choice is "sci." :-)


Note also that as of yet, to the best of my knowledge, there *is* no
NSFnet policy, but that one is forthcoming.)
-- 
Brad Templeton, Looking Glass Software, Waterloo, Ont. (519) 884-7473