[news.sysadmin] 4bsd ftpd for ultrix

mkhaw@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA (Mike Khaw) (11/19/88)

<2983@ci.sei.cmu.edu>, by pdb@sei.cmu.edu (Patrick Barron):
- I'm not sure about other vendors, but Digital will supposedly include fixed
- versions of ftpd and fingerd in Ultrix V3.0.  fingerd was not included at
- all in Ultrix V2.x, and the sendmail in V2.x does not have the DEBUG problem.
- The ftpd problem does exist, but with a few minor patches the code posted
- to comp.bugs.4bsd.ucb-fixes will work just fine under Ultrix.

But don't you lose tcp<->decnet gatewaying if you replace the Ultrix ftpd
with the 4.3bsd ftpd?

Mike Khaw
-- 
internet: mkhaw@teknowledge.arpa
uucp:	  {uunet|sun|ucbvax|decwrl|ames|hplabs}!mkhaw%teknowledge.arpa
hardcopy: Teknowledge Inc, 1850 Embarcadero Rd, POB 10119, Palo Alto, CA 94303

vixie@decwrl.dec.com (Paul Vixie) (11/19/88)

(Patrick Barron)
# [Ultrix V3.0 has fixed sendmail/ftpd, V2.X had no SMTPDEBUG or fingerd]

(Mike Khaw)
# But don't you lose tcp<->decnet gatewaying if you replace the Ultrix ftpd
# with the 4.3bsd ftpd?

Nope.  That's the FAL or something like that.  Different program altogether.
-- 
Paul Vixie
Work:    vixie@decwrl.dec.com    decwrl!vixie    +1 415 853 6600
Play:    paul@vixie.sf.ca.us     vixie!paul      +1 415 864 7013

pat@orac.UUCP (Pat Barron) (11/20/88)

In article <25914@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA>, mkhaw@teknowledge-vaxc.ARPA (Mike Khaw) writes:
> But don't you lose tcp<->decnet gatewaying if you replace the Ultrix ftpd
> with the 4.3bsd ftpd?

Yes, you do - if you use that functionality, then you lose, and (for the
moment) you get to choose between no DECnet-Internet Gateway FTP, and no
anonymous FTP (since the only other fix, until Ultrix V3.0, is to disable
anonymous FTP, since DEC won't distribute the source for the DECnet-Internet
Gateway and the "official" fix for V3.0-beta is "turn off anonymous FTP").

One other thing, speaking of security problems - there is a HUGE one
in the DECnet-Internet gateway.  DEC knows about it, and will send you
a fix - but only if you ask for it.  DON'T run the gateway version of
telnetd until you get the fix.  I won't post the problem here, but will
describe it if you send me mail.

Follow-ups to comp.unix.ultrix, please.

--Pat.