clarke@acheron.UUCP (Ed Clarke) (12/05/88)
I've just been cleaning up my 'active' file and have come up with a few groups that look valid, but are not found in the checkgroups.inet from Gene Spafford. Are these new ( since 12 Nov 88 ), bogus or should they go into another category ( like gnu, pubnet, alt )? Doesn't spaf coordinate 'comp'? comp.archives comp.lang.sigplan comp.sys.ibm.pc.net And I'm not even going to ask about 'alt.weemba.sheep' ... -- Ed Clarke uunet!bywater!acheron!clarke
spaf@cs.purdue.edu (Gene Spafford) (12/05/88)
comp.archives and comp.lang.sigplan are legit groups (at least,
they are as legit as any other group we have :-)
I dunno what comp.sys.ibm.pc.net is -- your posting is the
first I can recall even seeing it mentioned.
--spaf
--
Gene Spafford
NSF/Purdue/U of Florida Software Engineering Research Center,
Dept. of Computer Sciences, Purdue University, W. Lafayette IN 47907-2004
Internet: spaf@cs.purdue.edu uucp: ...!{decwrl,gatech,ucbvax}!purdue!spafspaf@cs.purdue.EDU (Gene Spafford) (12/06/88)
In article <5595@medusa.cs.purdue.edu>, spaf@cs.purdue.edu (Gene Spafford) writes: > I dunno what comp.sys.ibm.pc.net is -- your posting is the > first I can recall even seeing it mentioned. They say that memory is one of the first things to go... comp.sys.ibm.pc.net used to be an inet group (and, by extension, an Arpa discussion list). It went to /dev/null a month or two ago and can be rmgroup'd. -- Gene Spafford NSF/Purdue/U of Florida Software Engineering Research Center, Dept. of Computer Sciences, Purdue University, W. Lafayette IN 47907-2004 Internet: spaf@cs.purdue.edu uucp: ...!{decwrl,gatech,ucbvax}!purdue!spaf