[news.sysadmin] Mailers are *NOT* secure

chk@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca (C. Harald Koch) (12/08/88)

Current logic floating around the network:

	If you get abusive mail from someone, send mail to the postmaster at
	the originating system. This postmaster will of course take
	appropriate steps to deny the user access to his system or mailers,
	solving the problem.

There is a flaw in this reasoning: It is trivial to forge a mail message
using current mailers. SMail 2.5 will blindy accept any message headers you
care to type in. SMTP mailers trust anything coming in over TCP.

So what's to stop someone from being malicious under an assumed name? Or
even setting up a message that comes from the target user? (.i.e a message
From: chk@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca To: chk@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca)

How do you stop abusive mail then?

	Food for Thought,
		-chk
--
C. Harald Koch		NTT Systems, Inc., Toronto, Ontario
chk@zorac.dciem.dnd.ca, chk@gpu.utcs.toronto.edu, chk@chk.mef.unicus.com
Note: some sites may still have zorac.dciem.dnd.ca as zorac.ARPA.
"I give you my phone number. If you worry, call me. I'll make you happy."