tran@versatc.UUCP (Tony Tran) (04/02/89)
Recently, after posting a message, I've noticed that the following
message shows up:
Your article was spooled for later processing
I kind of expect the message to be processed immediately, but I haven't
seem message like (article posted successfully ... anymore).
What went wrong? Is this the new feature of patch 16 and 17 on 2.11B that
I didn't know about?
Tony Tran
--
UUCP: {sun,ames,pyramid}!versatc!tran Tony Tran
ARPA: tran@arisia.xerox.com
Versatec, 2805 Bowers Avenue, Santa Clara, Calif 95051 (408)982-4317
---pda@stiatl.UUCP (Paul Anderson) (04/06/89)
In article <16311@versatc.UUCP> tran@versatc.UUCP (Tony Tran) writes: >Recently, after posting a message, I've noticed that the following >message shows up: > Your article was spooled for later processing >I kind of expect the message to be processed immediately, but I haven't >seem message like (article posted successfully ... anymore). I noticed this myself last evening while posting a few articles. I believe this happens when expire(8) is running to prevent conflicts with control files. paul -- Paul Anderson "But Why?" gatech!stiatl!pda "Because they tried to make it (404) 841-4000 secure..."
arisco@cadillac.CAD.MCC.COM (John Arisco) (04/07/89)
In article <16311@versatc.UUCP> tran@versatc.UUCP (Tony Tran) writes:
# Recently, after posting a message, I've noticed that the following
# message shows up:
#
# Your article was spooled for later processing
#
# What went wrong? Is this the new feature of patch 16 and 17 on 2.11B that
# I didn't know about?
This has been around quite a while. It's in the patches as early
as PATCH-03, and I believe it predates that. It is displayed by inews (see
inews.c) if you post while expire is running.
John Arisco, MCC CAD Program | ARPA: arisco@mcc.com | Phone: [512] 338-3576
Box 200195, Austin, TX 78720 | UUCP: ...!cs.utexas.edu!milano!cadillac!arisco
--
John Arisco, MCC CAD Program | ARPA: arisco@mcc.com | Phone: [512] 338-3576
Box 200195, Austin, TX 78720 | UUCP: ...!cs.utexas.edu!milano!cadillac!arisco