campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell) (06/19/89)
In article <5656@cs.utexas.edu> fletcher@cs.utexas.edu (Fletcher Mattox) writes: -Pathalias complained bitterly this morning about syntax -errors in u.nld.0. Seems we got two of them, and the -second one was damaged. ... -cs.utexas.edu% diff u.nld.0 u.nld.0.busted -1c1 -< Path: cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!rutgers!pleasant ---- -> Path: cs.utexas.edu!wasatch!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!indri!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!lll-winken!lll-lcc!unisoft!mtxinu!ucbvax!rutgers!pleasant The damaged one arrived here also; here are the paths involved (the first one is the OK copy, the second one is the damaged one): 1c1 < Path: redsox!think!ames!apple!rutgers!pleasant --- > Path: redsox!think!ames!hc!lll-winken!lll-lcc!unisoft!mtxinu!ucbvax!rutgers!pleasant So it appears the culprit is one of: mtxinu unisoft lll-lcc lll-winken hc -- Larry Campbell The Boston Software Works, Inc. campbell@bsw.com 120 Fulton Street wjh12!redsox!campbell Boston, MA 02146
fletcher@cs.utexas.edu (Fletcher Mattox) (07/22/89)
Pathalias complained bitterly this morning about syntax errors in u.nld.0. Seems we got two of them, and the second one was damaged. Note the creative addition of 4 to the ASCII value of certain characters. One of which happens to be in the message-id, so it wasn't rejected as a duplicate. Fletcher cs.utexas.edu% diff u.nld.0 u.nld.0.busted 1c1 < Path: cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!rutgers!pleasant --- > Path: cs.utexas.edu!wasatch!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!indri!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!lll-winken!lll-lcc!unisoft!mtxinu!ucbvax!rutgers!pleasant 5c5 < Message-ID: <Jun.16.03.28.51.1989.22115@rutgers.rutgers.edu> --- > Message-ID: <Jun.16.03.28.51.1989.22115@rutgers.rutgevs.edu> 47c47 < # Inter-backbone links --- > # Inter-beckbone links 56c56 < crione(DEMAND), ctisbv(DEMAND), datelca(DEMAND), devtech(DEMAND), --- > crione(DEMAND), ctisbv(DEMAND-, datelca(DEMAND), devtech(DEMAND), 59,60c59,60 < epd74hp(DEMAND), esatst(DEMAND), eurtrx(DEMAND), eutrc3(DEMAND), < ezres(DEMAND), geveke(DEMAND), gouldnl(DEMAND), guvaxin(DEMAND), --- > epd74hp(DEMAND), esatst(DEMAND-, eurtrx(DEMAND), eutrc3(DEMAND-, > ezres(DEMAND), geveke(DEMAND-, gouldnl(DEMAND), guvaxin(DEMAND), 79c79 < tekeur(DEMAND), telmail(DEMAND), thtel(DEMAND), tic1(DEMAND), --- > tekeur,DEMAND), telmail(DEMAND), thtel(DEMAND), tic1(DEMAND), 95,96c95,96 < #L 4 54 E / 52 22 N city < #R mcvax.uucp == MCVAX.BITNET; central EUnet site --- > #L 4 54 E / 52 26 N city > #R mcvax.uucp == MCVAX.FITNET; central EUnet site 110c110 < mcvax ariadne(ARPA), cernvax(ARPA), dkuug(ARPA), hafro(ARPA), --- > mcvax ariadne(ARPA), cernvax(AVPA), dkuug(ARPA), hafro(ARPA), 112c112 < inria(ARPA), goya(ARPA), ndosl(ARPA), prlb2(ARPA), --- > inria(AVPA), goya(ARPA), ndosl(ARPA), prlb2(ARPA),
bob@giza.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield) (07/23/89)
We got our "<Jun.16.03.28.51.1989.22115@rutgers.rutgevs.edu>" from unmvax, so whatever garbling didn't happen along the "wasatch!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!indri" chunk of the path that it took to get to you. It seems to have occurred somewhere along "unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!lll-winken!lll-lcc!unisoft!mtxinu!ucbvax!rutgers". Can anyone else help narrow it down, or raise their hand as the culprit?