[news.sysadmin] LET'S NAME THE GUILTY POSTING SOFTWARE!!!

scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) (06/20/91)

rickert@mp.cs.niu.edu (Neil Rickert) writes:

>In article <6098@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu> sob@tmc.edu (Stan Barber) writes:
>>Mini-inews is NOT a transport. It is just a feed into NNTP which in turn
>>feeds it into the REAL inews in the news transport. THAT is where all these
>>checks should occur.

>  But that is exactly the point.  mini-inews does not do the error checking
>of the REAL inews, but if effectively isolates the poster from the REAL
>inews making good feedback difficult.

Good point.  What we really need is a "standard library" that will do
syntax checking on article headers.  Make it real portable, PD, and
hand it out to the world.  Henry/Geoff, is this section of C-news
"libraryizable"?  (gads, what a horrid neologism)

Once we have this, adding said function to mini-inews, waffle, etc,
etc, becomes relatively trivial.  It doesn't solve the problem of
installation that don't upgrade, but it's a solid step to make the
situation better in the future.
-- 
  "If we don't provide support to our users someone is bound to
   confuse us with Microsoft."
	-- Charles "Chip" Yamasaki

henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer) (06/25/91)

In article <scs.677425398@wotan.iti.org> scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) writes:
>Good point.  What we really need is a "standard library" that will do
>syntax checking on article headers.  Make it real portable, PD, and
>hand it out to the world.  Henry/Geoff, is this section of C-news
>"libraryizable"?  (gads, what a horrid neologism)

Probably not in the sense you're really after.  The header syntax is pretty
trivial; what's wanted is a *semantic* checker, so to speak, and that's much
harder to break out.  Header processing is a "hot spot" in timing, so much
attention has been paid to optimizing it.
-- 
"We're thinking about upgrading from    | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
SunOS 4.1.1 to SunOS 3.5."              |  henry@zoo.toronto.edu  utzoo!henry