guy@gorodish.UUCP (02/15/87)
In article <364@boulder.UUCP> cdash@nike.UUCP (Charles Shub) writes: >In article <286@desoto.UUCP> shz@desoto.UUCP (S. Zirin) writes: >>In <2253@felix.UUCP> zemon writes: >> >>> <request> >>> >><response> > >zemon's response to zirin's timely request is non-productive. Zemon's response to Zirin's request is non-*existent*, as is Zirin's request. Zirin's response to Zemon's request is what is in question here. Was this just a slip of the mind, or do the attribution lines stuck in (with the best of intentions, I'm sure) by various netnews programs possibly cause more problems than they're worth? (I *always* delete them, simply to avoid this kind of problem.)