chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) (11/30/86)
In article <5362@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn) writes: >If you want to roast Berkeley, how about roasting them for deciding >that those (int)s should be (int *)s Which (int)s? (I am dating myself now: I go back only to 4.1BSD.) >and that the size of the data structures should be encoded into >an itty-bitty field within the ioctl code. Who said that? That it *is now* does not mean that it *should be*: ioctl() could be a macro that calls the `real' ioctl function. -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7690) UUCP: seismo!mimsy!chris ARPA/CSNet: chris@mimsy.umd.edu