dave@rosevax.Rosemount.COM (Dave Marquardt) (01/15/87)
We are trying to decide whether to purchase Mt. Xinu 4.3 BSD+NFS or DEC's ULTRIX, so I am looking for comments about these products, good or bad. Also, if you've used both products, I'd be very interested in comparisons. We are especially interested in knowing what kind of support we can expect from Mt. Xinu or DEC. Please respond by mail. Thanks in advance. Dave Marquardt Rosemount, Inc. {cbosgd,ihnp4,uiucdcs}!rosevax!dave dave@rosevax.Rosemount.COM -- Dave Marquardt New mail: dave@rosevax.Rosemount.COM Rosemount, Inc. Old mail: {cbosgd,ihnp4,uiucdcs}!rosevax!dave 12001 Technology Drive Telephone: 612/828-3057 Eden Prairie, MN 55344
mb@ttidca.UUCP (Michael Bloom) (01/17/87)
In article <822@rosevax.Rosemount.COM> dave@rosevax.Rosemount.COM (Dave Marquardt) writes: >We are trying to decide whether to purchase Mt. Xinu 4.3 BSD+NFS or DEC's >ULTRIX, so I am looking for comments about these products, good or bad. We did a study before making our decision, and checked many references. Most sites with Mt. Xinu seemed to be satisfied customers, while many sites with Ultrix wished they had More/BSD. Our experience with Mt. Xinu has been mostly good. Just prior to the release of 4.3, support for 4.2 kind of slowed down, but was still there. We had a major problem that was the result of a coding error in NFS that was SUN's fault, and appears in just about every vendor's release of NFS. This would result in corruption of data on the NFS client side. Mt. Xinu shipped us a fix by uucp the same day they fixed it on their own systems. If we had been dealing with DEC we might have had to wait several months before the fix had been properly packaged in the next update, and had migrated its way to the shipping docks. I'd say the choice is easy. Go with Mt. Xinu.