notes@acf3.UUCP (02/05/87)
A while back, around 1984 or early 1985, a program was posted to net.sources that allowed someone to 'watch' or spy on another terminal being used. It echoed both the input and output to/from a person's tty. It dealt with clists (it wasn't a shell script). Does anyone have a copy of it around, or know where I can get it? It would be very useful to (1) monitor terminals we have that act as group consoles, and (2) we have had some "problem" users, and sometimes need to see what they are doing. This may not be the right newsgroup, but then again, it's not something that every user should have access to (please don't send flames!) This was on a 4.2bsd machine. Please e-mail me the responses if you wish. Thanks. Gary J. Rosenblum gary@nyu.arpa, gary@acf3, root@acf3, root@nyu.nyu.edu UNIX Systems Manager New York University {ihnp4, allegra}!acf3!root
rosenblg@acf3.UUCP (02/09/87)
I've received a number of replies, including one that asked me to post it to the net. Of course I won't due that, for obvious reasons. I can't forward these programs, but one author said I can post his name here for inquiries. One such program is from pdb@sei.cmu.edu so you can send him (Patrick) mail. I'll post other names as I get their ok. Gary J. Rosenblum gary@nyu.arpa, gary@acf3, root@acf3, root@nyu.nyu.edu UNIX Systems Manager New York University {ihnp4, allegra}!acf3!root Relay-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf3.UUCP From: agrawal@acf2.UUCP (Mukul Babu Agrawal) Date: 9-Feb-87 13:55 EST Date-Received: 9-Feb-87 13:55 EST Subject: Re: Sikh persecution in India Message-ID: <370001@acf2.UUCP> Path: acf3!acf2!agrawal Newsgroups: soc.culture.indian Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site acf2.UUCP Organization: New York University References: <185000001@uiucdcs> >From: reddy@uiucdcs.UUCP >Date: 2-Feb-87 13:58 EST >Date-Received: 7-Feb-87 20:42 EST >Subject: Sikh persecution in India ************ >The creation of a Punjabi-speaking state was stalled for a long time, for >fear that it would be a Sikh-dominated state. When it was finally created, >a specific time frame was decided for the transfer of Chandigarh to Punjab, >but it was not adhered to. My impression was that it was the creation of the Hindi speaking state ( Haryana ) that was stalled. It were the Haryaanvees who were agitating for a separate state. >As far as I can see, both of these were done by >the Congress party in its own political interests. I agree with that, but I fail to understand how it can be taken as persecution of Sikhs. It was not a move by the Hindus to isolate or discriminate against the Sikhs but rather the actions of a particular politician ( who happened to be Hindu ). Furthermore even assuming that the transfer of Chandeegarh was not carried out because the central govt. was acting in bad faith, it should be considered to be against the Punjabees, 45% of whom happen to be non-Sikhs. > >Further, Congress did not give enough political leeway to Akalis just as it >is doing now. (The creation of Bhindranwale is an example). Whenever >Congress was in power in Punjab, I think Punjab was forced to make decisions >which were not in the interest of Punjab, in case of river waters, border >disputes etc. Once again, this cannot be taken as discrimination against Sikhs. The central govt. didnot give leeway to most of the state govts. A number of states have been forced to take actions not in their best interests. The actions taken in Punjaab were taken by an elected govt. which happened to be a congress govt. The reason the whole talk of discrimination has come about is because the Akaalees were unable to sustain power through popular election. Since the base of the Akaalees is mostly Sikhs, what better way to whip up feelings other than talking about 'discrimination' against the Sikhs. -- Mukul agrawal@acf2.nyu.edu ...cmcl2!acf2!agrawal