chris@mimsy.UUCP (11/13/87)
>In article <9313@mimsy.UUCP> I threatened that >>... `i =+ 1' will not compile, though `i += 1' will. In article <6667@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn) points out: > i =+ 1; [is `i = +1;' where `+' is unary plus] Yoonerry plus? We don't need no steenkeng yoonerry plus! :-) We do not (yet) have plans for a fully ANSI-draft-compatible compiler (though I will mention gcc here, like so: `gcc'). Unary plus might get in, or might not. (And we might be further along if I did not waste all this time on netnoise.) (On the other hand, I hardly ever do anything to the compiler myself anyway---Donn Seeley does all the real work.) -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 7690) Domain: chris@mimsy.umd.edu Path: uunet!mimsy!chris