[comp.unix.wizards] Tracking Al Einstein - software sug

aglew@ccvaxa.UUCP (11/07/87)

>Does anyone know why dates are not usually written in a most to 
>least significant order?
>
>                                       -- Ray (lampman@heurikon.UUCP)

It depends on where you come from. I've been writing 1987 November 4
ever since high school. I make lots of mistakes on M/D/Y, D/M/Y, etc.
forms - I think that they should all be Y/M/D. Therefore I nearly
always use 4 digits for the year, and spell out the month - avoids
confusion.

henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) (11/17/87)

> >Does anyone know why dates are not usually written in a most to 
> >least significant order?

Because it violates a fundamental principle of building things for humans,
not programs:  put the most useful information first.  The year is usually
not the "most significant" information to a human!

> ... I nearly
> always use 4 digits for the year, and spell out the month - avoids
> confusion.

An excellent rule, regardless of what order you use.
-- 
Those who do not understand Unix are |  Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
condemned to reinvent it, poorly.    | {allegra,ihnp4,decvax,utai}!utzoo!henry