johnl@ima.ISC.COM (John R. Levine) (05/31/88)
In article <22024@labrea.Stanford.EDU> karish@denali.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish) writes: > The remark about SysV Rel 2 compatibility surprises > me. My understanding is that the original port for the > RT was from Sys V Rel 1, but I don't know enough about the > differences between V.1 and V.2 to tell whether AIX has > followed the changes. Does anyone have more information? I was the architect of the Unix part of AIX for the RT. We started with the SVR1 tape, and it was an explicit goal that AIX be a strict superset of Sys V. IBM moves very slowly and I wouldn't be surprised if they haven't yet gotten around to moving the RT to V.2, since they have been quite busy adding their kind of networking, configuration support, and windowing. In case you were wondering, I haven't the faintest idea what the secret thing is that makes AIX so particularly well suited to the the base for the OSF software. -- John R. Levine, IECC, PO Box 349, Cambridge MA 02238-0349, +1 617 492 3869 { ihnp4 | decvax | cbosgd | harvard | yale }!ima!johnl, Levine@YALE.something Rome fell, Babylon fell, Scarsdale will have its turn. -G. B. Shaw