bgt@homxc.ATT.COM (B.TONGUE) (04/09/89)
Folks, Concerning ncsl, is there a nawk program which would accomplish the same thing in a fraction of the time? Seems that searching a line for a pattern ( /*..[..]..*/ ) or ( #..) shouldn't be that difficult - what am I overlooking? Thanks in advance for the help. -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %% The Speaking Tongue, AT&T %% C Code. C Code Run. Run, Code, RUN! %% %% (..att!..)homxc!bgt %% PLEASE!!!! %% %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
djones@megatest.UUCP (Dave Jones) (04/12/89)
From article <6257@homxc.ATT.COM>, by bgt@homxc.ATT.COM (B.TONGUE): > > Concerning ncsl, is there a nawk program which would accomplish > the same thing in a fraction of the time? Seems that searching > a line for a pattern ( /*..[..]..*/ ) or ( #..) shouldn't be > that difficult - what am I overlooking? > String literals, multiple line comments, and (shudder) preprocessor directives.