jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) (10/05/89)
In article <AGLEW.89Oct3211441@chant.urbana.mcd.mot.com> aglew@urbana.mcd.mot.com (Andy-Krazy-Glew) writes: >I do not know about the tacky bit John F. Haugh II describes, but it >sounds similar to the directory continuation that Korn(?) and friends >have played around with recently - except directory continuation is >more general. I realized after writing that bit of tongue-in-cheek nonsense that ``directory continuation'' really might have a useful purpose. Is there anything more that can be said about it or is it supposed to be hush-hush work? -- John F. Haugh II +-Things you didn't want to know:------ VoiceNet: (512) 832-8832 Data: -8835 | The real meaning of MACH is ... InterNet: jfh@rpp386.cactus.org | ... Messages Are Crufty Hacks. UUCPNet: {texbell|bigtex}!rpp386!jfh +--------------------------------------
ekrell@hector.UUCP (Eduardo Krell) (10/06/89)
In article <17097@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes: >I realized after writing that bit of tongue-in-cheek nonsense that >``directory continuation'' really might have a useful purpose. > >Is there anything more that can be said about it or is it supposed >to be hush-hush work? If you have the summer '89 Usenix proceedings, look at the paper "The 3-D File System". "continuation directories" was on old name we used internally to refer to it. Eduardo Krell AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ UUCP: {att,decvax,ucbvax}!ulysses!ekrell Internet: ekrell@ulysses.att.com