lyndon@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Lyndon Nerenberg) (10/27/89)
In article <1989Oct22.190407.13515@cpd.com> neil@uninet.UUCP (Neil Gorsuch) writes: [ mild flames deleted ] >You might be able to get on it, assuming 2 things happen: [ ... ] >2. I clear out the backlog of 637 security-request letters Didn't the last posting (early October) say the backlog was at about 350? Seems like you got some responses ... The problem with the list on isis was a lack of time on the moderators part. Digests just weren't coming out. The current backlog of unprocessed subscription requests is no better than the old problem. When can we expect these requests to be processed? If you don't have time to keep up with maintaining the list, perhaps another moderator (with sufficient time to maintain the list) should be found? (That's *not* a flame) -- Lyndon Nerenberg VE6BBM / Computing Services / Athabasca University {alberta,decwrl,lsuc}!atha!lyndon || lyndon@cs.AthabascaU.CA The Connector is the Notwork.
denbeste@bgsuvax.UUCP (William C. DenBesten) (10/28/89)
From article <1192@atha.AthabascaU.CA>, by lyndon@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Lyndon Nerenberg): > You might be able to get on it, assuming 2 things happen: > 2. I clear out the backlog of 637 security-request letters In article <1989Oct22.190407.13515@cpd.com> neil@uninet.UUCP (Neil Gorsuch) writes: > > The problem with the list on isis was a lack of time on the moderators > part. Digests just weren't coming out. The current backlog of unprocessed > subscription requests is no better than the old problem. Perhaps this is an indication that this too much for one person and multiple people should be working on it. Perhaps a person or people could authenticate susbsription requests and forward the list of names to the moderator. -- William C. DenBesten is denbeste@bgsu.edu or denbesten@bgsuopie.bitnet