[comp.unix.wizards] Shared memory mapping question.

devil@techunix.BITNET (Gil Tene) (03/22/90)

Hello netland...,

I am doing some work on a Sun, under SonOS 4.0.3, using the System V
shared memory interface. I have succesfully mapped and used shared memory
several times.  I am trying to solve the following problem:

I have one process creating a shared image of both data and data pointers,
and I would like the pointers in the shared data pointers map to point
to the correct data address in all processes, mapping the data and the
data pointers is easy, but since mapping (using shmat) is usually done
to a "randomly" selected virtual address in every process, meaning that
they get trough ok, but don't point to the data.

I am trying to avoid using "relative" pointers , i.e. index from data table
start, since speed is of crucial importance in my application.

I am aware of the fact that shmat() accepts a paddress argument, telling it
where to map the shared memory to (in the process virtual address space).

My problem is : How do i "allocate" a specific area in process virtual space,
in order to map the shared memory into it. How can i specify this virtual
process address as a constant, and where do i take it from (top of user
vir. address space, etc.). Allocating using sbrk() or malloc() variaties,
doesn't give me any way to control the exact address of the allocated block...

I am trying to  avoid the criminal act of assuming that all my
processes have a virtual address space smaller than some constant, and mapping
to an address above it. What I am looking for is a system call
that hides this act.

I would apreciate any help on this subject, and will summerize e-mail
responses to the net....

Thanks in advance...

        Gil Tene.

        devil@techunix.technion.ac.il
        devil@techunix.BITNET

cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) (03/23/90)

In article <9464@discus.technion.ac.il> devil%techunix.bitnet@jade.berkeley.edu (Gil Tene) writes:
>My problem is : How do i "allocate" a specific area in process virtual space,
>in order to map the shared memory into it. How can i specify this virtual
>process address as a constant, and where do i take it from (top of user
>vir. address space, etc.). Allocating using sbrk() or malloc() variaties,
>doesn't give me any way to control the exact address of the allocated block...

Pulling an old response out of the saved bucket:

  From cpcahil Wed Nov  1 09:37:04 1989
  Path: virtech!cpcahil
  From: cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill)
  Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
  Subject: Re: Shared memory and pointers
  Message-ID: <1989Nov1.143704.9258@virtech.uucp>
  Date: 1 Nov 89 14:37:04 GMT
  References: <525@wizard.UUCP>
  Distribution: usa
  Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc.
  Lines: 24
  
  In article <525@wizard.UUCP>, john@wizard.UUCP (John Danner) writes:
  > group, neither of which are very clean.  First, make sure that every client
  > maps each block of shared memory to the same location.  Second, replace
  > pointers with something like objectID's and keep a table on the server which
  > has block #'s and offsets for each objectID.  
  
  I have seen 2 solutions to these problems.
  
  	1.  have the first program that creates the shared memory segment
  	attach it at whatever address it determins is appropriate and
  	then writes said address  into the first 4 bytes of the shared memory
  	segment itself.  All follow on program will attach the segment  at the
  	default address, read the address that it should be attached at, 
  	detach it, and finally re-attach it at the appropriate address.
  
  	2. keep track of data using relative pointers (offset from the 
  	begining of the shared memory segment) this is a real bear.
  
  
  
-- 
Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170