blm@aquarium.ecn.purdue.edu (Brian L Moore) (10/12/90)
peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >After looking at other successful hierarchies, I've decided that there are >a large number of potential UNIX groups that are missing from the comp.unix >hierarchy... I vote for: > comp.unix.wizards Of, by, and for UNIX wizards > comp.unix.hackers Of, by, and for UNIX hackers > comp.unix.gurus Of, by, and for UNIX gurus > comp.unix.reviews Reviews of UNIX software packages > comp.unix.vendors Notes and complaints about UNIX vendors > comp.unix.tech Technical discussion about UNIX > comp.unix.funny Humorous articles about UNIX > comp.binaries.unix UNIX binaries, X backgrounds, etc. I have not comment on: > comp.unix.rumors What OSF and UI will do next. > comp.unix.embedded Embedded systems running UNIX > comp.unix.clones Minix, Coherent, etc... > comp.unix.futures UNIX in the stock market -blm -- Brian L Moore, Student Programmer | Purdue University Engineering Computer Network | internet: blm@ecn.purdue.edu MSEE Building, Room 104 | BITNET: BMOORE@PURCCVM W. Lafayette, IN 47906 (317) 494-5745 |