carl@aoa.UUCP (Carl Witthoft) (06/02/88)
x
I'd like a useful version of "at" if such a thing exists ( :=( ).
In particular, the things lacking in our present version of at
(on Ultr*x) are:
1) No way to find out what jobs are presently queued,or
in fact to way to find out anything at all.
2) It's difficult to get the output of at, except for the
clumsy method of "at [time] [job] >>&crashlog "
3) As a result of (1), no way to kill queued jobs.
Anybody got better stuff out there?
TAI
--
Alix' Dad ( Carl Witthoft @ Adaptive Optics Associates)
{ima,harvard}!bbn!aoa!carl
54 CambridgePark Drive, Cambridge,MA 02140 617-864-0201
" Axis-navigo, ergo sum."