ping@hub.toronto.edu (Ping Lin) (06/05/89)
Does anyone know if there are any interpreters (or compilers) for an object-oriented language on the net or in public domain? A friend of mine, who doesn't have access to the net, would like to experiment with object-oriented programming to see if it is suitable for the project that she is working on.
darrylo@hpnmdla.HP.COM (Darryl Okahata) (06/07/89)
In comp.sources.wanted, ping@hub.toronto.edu (Ping Lin) writes: > Does anyone know if there are any interpreters (or compilers) for an > object-oriented language on the net or in public domain? A friend > of mine, who doesn't have access to the net, would like to experiment > with object-oriented programming to see if it is suitable for the > project that she is working on. There is "g++", the GNU C++ compiler. It's not public domain, but it is, for the most part, freely copyable as long as you don't try to make money off it. It runs on 68000 and 80386 (?) Un*x machines, but you need a *ton* of disk space to compile everything (~35 MB for a complete system). -- Darryl Okahata UUCP: {hpcea!, hpfcla!} hpnmd!darrylo Internet: darrylo%hpnmd@hpcea.HP.COM CIS: 75206,3074 Disclaimer: the above is the author's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of his employer or of the little green men that have been following him all day.
fischer@iesd.dk (Lars P. Fischer) (06/12/89)
In comp.sources.wanted, ping@hub.toronto.edu (Ping Lin) writes: > Does anyone know if there are any interpreters (or compilers) for an > object-oriented language on the net or in public domain? There is "Little Smalltalk", by Tim Budd (budd@cs.orst.edu). A simple, but usefull, implementation of Smalltalk, runs on several machines. The book "A Little Smalltalk", by Budd, describes the systems. Available at several archives. /Lars -- Copyright 1989 Lars Fischer; you can redistribute only if your recipients can. Lars Fischer, fischer@iesd.dk, {...}!mcvax!iesd!fischer Our audience is programmers, because the UNIX environments was designed fundamentally for programming. -- Kernighan & Pike