[net.music] Steve Reich: Music as a Gradual Process

cbostrum (01/30/83)

I do not mean thee process of composition, but rather pieces of music that
are, literally, processes.  The distinctive thing about musical processes
is that they determine the note-to-note details and the over all form
simultaniously.  (Think of a round or infinite canon.)
I am interested in perceptible processes.  I want to be able to hear the 
process happening throughout the sounding music.  To facilitate closely 
detailed listening, a musical process should happen extremely gradually.
Performing and listening to a gradual musical process resemles: pulling
back a swing, releasing it, and observing it gradually come to rest...
turning over an hour glass and watching the sand slowly run through to 
the bottom...placing your feet in the sand by the ocean's edge and
watching, feeling, and listening to the waves gradually bury them.
It's quite natural to think about musical processes if one has 
frequently worked with electro-mechanical sound equipment.
All music turns out to be ethnic music.
Musical processes can give one a direct contact with the impersonal
and also a kind of complete control, and one doesn't always think
of the impersonal and complete control as going together.  By
"a kind" of complete control I mean: by running this material 
through the process I completely control all that results, but 
also I accept all that results without changes.
During the 1950's and '60s John Cage used processes and certainly
accepted their results, but the processes he used were compositional
ones that could not be heard when the music was performed. The
process of using the I Ching or imperfections in a sheet of paper
to determine musical parameters can't be heard when listening to
music composed that way.  The compositional process and the 
sounding music have no audible connection. Similarly in serial 
music, the series itself is seldom audible.
What I'm interested in is a compositional process and a sounding
music that are one and the same thing.  I don't know any secrets
of structure that you can't hear. We all listen to the process 
together since it's quite audible, and one of the reasons it's
quite audible is becuase it's happening extremely gradually.
The use of hidden structural devices in music never appealed
to me.  Even when all the cards are on the table and everyone
hears what is gradually happening in a musical process, there
are still enough mysteries to satisfy all.  These mysteries are the
impersonal, unintended, psycho-acoustic by products of the in-
tended process.  These might include sub-melodies heard within
repeated melodic patterns, effects due to listener location,
slight irregularities in performance, harmonics, difference 
tones, etc.
Listening to an extremely gradual musical process opens my ears
to it, but it always extends farther than I can hear, and that
makes it interesting to listen to that musical process again.
That area of every gradual (completely controlled) musical 
process, where one hears the details of the sound moving out away 
from intentions, occurring for their own acoustic reasons, is it.
I begin to perceive these minute details when I can sustain close
attention, and a gradual process invites my sustained attention. 
By "gradual" I mean extremely gradual; a process happening so 
slowly and gradually that listening to it resembles watching the
minute hand on a watch - you can perceive it moving after you
stay with it a little while.
Several currently (1968) popular modal musics, such as Indian
Classical and drug-oriented rock and roll, may make us aware 
of minute sound details because in being modal (constant key
center, hypnotically droning and repetitious) they naturally
focus on these details rather than on frequent key change,
counterpoint, and other peculiarly Western devices.  Never-
theless, these modal musics remain more or less strict frame-
works for improvisation.  They are not processes.
The distinctive thing about musical processes is that they 
determine the note-to-note details and the overall form 
simultaneously. One can't improvise  in a musical process--
the concepts are mutually exclusive.  
While performing and listening to a gradual musical process one
can participate in a particularly liberating and impersonal
kind of ritual.  Focusing in on the musical process makes
possible that shift of attention away from he and she and
you and me outwards (or inwards) towards it.