ncgus@ndsuvax.UUCP (Jim Gustafson) (10/07/88)
In article <141@deimos.cis.ksu.edu> rezac@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes: | Does anyone know of an PD code to display CAT scanned images on a PC or | Macintosh? | | The data scans in as a series of 512X512 picture 12 bits per pixel? | | Any information is appreciated. While the requestor specifically asked for PD scan images, I'd just like to remind everyone that most (if not all) CT data formats are propriatory. Also, care must be taken to protect all patients' rights, etc. whenever CT image data drifts out into the public domain, etc. Nuf said, etc. -- Jim Gustafson UUCP: uunet!ndsuvax!ncgus North Dakota State University Bitnet: ncgus@ndsuvax Fargo, North Dakota 58105 Internet: ncgus@plains.nodak.edu
cfchiesa@bsu-cs.UUCP (Christopher Chiesa) (10/12/88)
In article <1469@ndsuvax.UUCP>, ncgus@ndsuvax.UUCP (Jim Gustafson) writes: > In article <141@deimos.cis.ksu.edu> rezac@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu writes: > | Does anyone know of an PD code to display CAT scanned images on a PC or > | Macintosh? > | >[...] > While the requestor specifically asked for PD scan images, I'd just like > to remind everyone that most (if not all) CT data formats are propriatory. > > Also, care must be taken to protect all patients' rights, etc. whenever CT > image data drifts out into the public domain, etc. > I'm a bit behind in this group so forgive me if this has already been beaten to death... I just obtained a bunch of PD disks for an Amiga 1000, which among many other things included a CAT scan image viewer/processor program. I don't know if that fits the bill -- heck, maybe rezac@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu SAW this and that's what gave him (?) the idea in the first place... but I thought I'd mention it... It DOES come with several "images of actual humans," who are NOT iden- tified nor described. That line ( ^^^^^ etc.) is ALL that is said about them -- does that protect their rights sufficiently, or not? Just curious... -- UUCP: <backbones>!{iuvax,pur-ee,uunet}!bsu-cs!cfchiesa cfchiesa@bsu-cs.UUCP