markv@tillamook.uucp (Mark VandeWettering) (05/19/89)
Allright folks, I logged in this morning with 23 new messages in comp.graphics, nearly all having to do with pornography. This newsgroup is not for the discussion of morals and ethics and what defines pornography. If people want to discuss these topics, there are appropriate news groups in which to do so. This is comp.graphics. Pixels, frame buffers, point in polygon testing, frame buffer quantization, halftoning, raytracing and radiosity are what should be discussed here. Please take this discussion elsewhere. Mark VandeWettering "Who put the alt.sex in my comp.graphics?"
mjb@aipna.ed.ac.uk (Michael Beaton) (05/25/89)
In article <4706@uoregon.uoregon.edu> markv@tillamook.UUCP (Mark VandeWettering) writes: > > Blimey, I'm not allowed to forward more text than I add... O.K., in article <4706@uoregon.uoregon.edu> Mark VandeWettering complains about the computer pornography discussion in comp.graphics. The ongoing discussion seems to be about computer graphics to me... (Anyway we don't even get alt.sex here, 'gis a break!) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ mjb@uk.ac.ed.aipna ------------------------------------------------------------------------------