eugene@eos.UUCP (Eugene Miya) (12/08/89)
Mark suggests making a bibliography on scientific visiualization.
I would not suggest you do this. ACM/SIGGRAPH has a person (Baldev Singh)
who watches references, previously it was G. Schrack. My suggestion
is for you to contribute references to Baldev (open up a copy of ACM
computer graphics [recent of course]) rather than make your own,
place the appropriate keywords in the keyword field. These make it
into ACM CG. Rather than duplicate efforts. Contribute (with keywords).
In turn, we (Bay Area ACM/SIGGRAPH) will place them in the servers
at DEC. (I think this is better than frequently posted references.
Additionally, we have been quietly adding years to DEC. (They are there
now and the sever daemon gets them). We will
post an announcement when the additional years have been added.
I am editing (rm'ing dups, typos, etc.) reformatting work with the help
of others. (Jef should probably have the addresses to the Freq Q list).
Computer graphics is unique of all the disciplines I've seen to have
so complete a list.
Note: in some parts of the world it is spelling "visualisation"
not "visualization." Search programs need to know this.
Another gross generalization from
--eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@aurora.arc.nasa.gov
resident cynic at the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers:
"You trust the `reply' command with all those different mailers out there?"
"If my mail does not reach you, please accept my apology."
{ncar,decwrl,hplabs,uunet}!ames!eugene
Support the Free Software Foundation (FSF)