kevinc@cs.AthabascaU.CA (Kevin Crocker) (02/13/90)
I think a CAD group would be a great idea.
I use CADKEY 3.0 and really need to do some solid synthesis. I'm
trying to do a 3D rendering of a N-dimensional equation, of course only
three variables are of importance. I have been having an incredibly
difficult time in getting the conceptualization of this rendering
across to collegues. I've tried math but I'm a little weak in
Catastrophe Mathematics, mostly because I can't cleanly define the
breakpoints except as generic cases. what I can do is visualize this
situation and so I want to make a nice 3D rendering that I can rotate
and manipulate.
A CAD group sounds like a neat way to learn more about how CAD programs
and solid sythesis works.
Kevin
--
Kevin "auric" Crocker Athabasca University
UUCP: ...!{alberta,ncc,attvcr}!atha!kevinc
Inet: kevinc@cs.AthabscaU.CAml@ktibv.uucp (Marinko Laban) (02/13/90)
Yes, I vote for a CAD group. Being a staff member of the CAD/Automation
Department of KTI, I would surely be helped by a CAD group. Thinks
I could use:
1. Software & Hardware evaluation
2. Experience exchange of hard&software
3. Trouble shooting
etc.
etc.