[comp.graphics] How to use GSS*CGI Metafiles

d87-vik@dront.nada.kth.se (Ville K{rkk{inen) (09/17/90)

	I have got this *IDEA* ....

	I'm hacking on the *ultimate screen_editor* ,( nothing fancy really )
	for the IBM-PC, and as I'm used to the Macintosh world I'm trying to
	port the concepts of  'WYSIWYG' kind of dialog editing. Now to the
	problem. What is this 'Metafile' stuff ???. As far as I'm concerned
	it's some kind of device independent way of storing your pictures.
	I'm using the GSS*CGI graphics development toolkit, and inside it
	I found these 'Metafile' drivers. It seems to me like they create
	files ( really *BIG* )  containing info 'bout the pic's , but after
	storing them, how do I get them back !! ( i.e do I have to parse
	the created files my self, and if, what are the formats and so on )

	Any comments, such as references, source etc. would be appreciated.
	
	As I'm new to the net, please forgive me for asking *stupid* questions,
	but I really want to know, and I thought this group would be
	appropiate.

	Ville K{rkk{inen	d87-vik@nada.kth.se
	

geoffs@gssc.UUCP (Geoff Shapiro) (09/17/90)

In article <1990Sep16.232108.21580@nada.kth.se> d87-vik@dront.nada.kth.se (Ville K{rkk{inen) writes:
|	I'm using the GSS*CGI graphics development toolkit, and inside it
|	I found these 'Metafile' drivers. It seems to me like they create
|	files ( really *BIG* )  containing info 'bout the pic's , but after
|	storing them, how do I get them back !! ( i.e do I have to parse
|	the created files my self, and if, what are the formats and so on )

You don't really have to parse them yourself (unless you are a masochist).
Instead you can use the metafile interpreters supplied with the drivers from
GSS. I work for GSS, though not in the group that deals with the CGI stuff.
Why don't you send email to barbara@gssc.gss.com (she is one of our technical
support people) to get the info you would like...

|	As I'm new to the net, please forgive me for asking *stupid* questions,
|	but I really want to know, and I thought this group would be
|	appropiate.

The question wasn't *stupid* at all. That's what the net is for, use it.