sean@utoday.com (04/29/91)
QUESTION #3: Are X terminals a cost-effective solution? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This question is being posted to gather responses for a regular column in UNIX Today! called "net.views". The purpose of the column is to generate user response to questions of importance in the Unix industry. By sending an e-mail reply to the above question, you are granting UNIX Today! permission to consider your comments for publication. A summary of e-mail responses to this post will be posted in this two weeks from today. /* Please include a daytime telephone number! */ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
andreess@mrlaxs.mrl.uiuc.edu (Marc Andreessen) (04/30/91)
In article <1991Apr29.160744.25080@utoday.com> netviews@utoday.com writes: > This question is being posted to gather responses for a regular >column in UNIX Today! called "net.views". [...] Garbage like this makes me say 'yo' to a moderated .research group... please... soon... Maybe in honor of UNIX Today! this group should be renamed `comp.graphics!'. Marc -- Marc Andreessen___________University of Illinois Materials Research Laboratory Internet: andreessen@uimrl7.mrl.uiuc.edu____________Bitnet: andreessen@uiucmrl
peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) (04/30/91)
In article <1991Apr29.160744.25080@utoday.com> netviews@utoday.com writes: > Are X terminals a cost-effective solution? A cost effective solution for what? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"
6sigma2@polari.UUCP (Brian Matthews) (05/01/91)
In article <1991Apr29.160744.25080@utoday.com> netviews@utoday.com writes: |QUESTION #3: | Are X terminals a cost-effective solution? That's easy. The only possible answer is: What problem are you trying to solve?