[comp.graphics] What to call PHIGS

jch@Stardent.COM (Jan Hardenbergh) (05/01/91)

cannon@tornado.dsd.es.com (Gary Cannon) writes:
> > PHIGS-PLUS (nee' PHIGS+) is an addendum to PHIGS.  The original ANSI
> > standard X3144-1988 (PHIGS88) is being "obsoleted" in favor of the
> > IDENTICAL ISO9592 (PHIGS89).
> >
> > So, PHIGS refers to both.
> 
> PHIGS PLUS is a new Part 4 to PHIGS and addenda to Parts 1-3. This means
> that an implementation can be parts 1-3 compliant and not Part 4.
> Addendum requires compliance for all implementations. PHIGS PLUS need
> not be supported to be PHIGS Parts 1-3 compliant.

True enough, but how many PHIGS88 only implementations will there be in
1992? It seems as though most PHIGS people use PHIGS to refer to both
PHIGS88 and PHIGS-PLUS.

I do not really care what terms refer to - I would like to have common
definitions for the terms.  It seems the most common usage is for PHIGS
to refer to PHIGS88 + PHIGS-PLUS.  The sort of follows the precedent set
by FORTRAN.  FORTRAN refers to the latest version or all versions.
FORTRAN66, FORTRAN77 and FORTRAN8X refer to specific versions.

Another possible term is ANSI-PHIGS and ISO-PHIGS, since PHIGS-PLUS will
not become and ANSI standard.

"A foolish conistency is the hobgoblin of small minds"






-- 
-Jan "YON" Hardenbergh       jch@stardent.com         (508)-371-9810x261
Stardent Computer, 6 N.E. Tech Center, 521 Virginia Rd,Concord, MA 01742