oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious Oyster) (05/31/85)
In article <5700@ucla-cs.ARPA> ellen@ucla-cs.UUCP (Ellen Perlman) writes: >other hand, is quite sensitive, and gets terrible headaches, so can this >"is a crock" crap. In fact, the number of people sensitive to MSG is not >minute, 'tho' naturally degree of sensitivity varies. > So, some people react to MSG and some don't. Do we have a consensus? Oh, and the "is a crock" line was made by somebody in reference to somebody elses' statement that "MSG ensures" reactions, cancer, etc. (In fact, the line went "the argument AS STATED is a crock" [my caps]). I concurred when I read it, because I don't react adversely to MSG. Perhaps the initial statement should have been ammended to read "MSG ensures reactions in a not minute number of people." 'Nuff said. -- - j "vo" p {allegra,ihnp4,seismo}!uwvax!uwmacc!oyster