[comp.graphics] DIGITIZING 35MM SLIDES

ATDYW@ASUACAD.BITNET (05/29/91)

Does anyone out there known of a GOOD way to digitize 35mm slides? I mean
other than using a vcr-to-digital conversion? I would like to avoid displaying
the slides, taking pictures and digitizing the pictures. There must be some
way to do it directly. Any help will be appreciated. <DW>

eric@mcrware.UUCP (Eric Miller) (05/30/91)

In article <91148.143625ATDYW@ASUACAD.BITNET> ATDYW@ASUACAD.BITNET writes:
>Does anyone out there known of a GOOD way to digitize 35mm slides?

I have seen a decent unit from Kodak that has a slide carousel on top and
RGB outputs on the back.  We plugged it straight into our frame grabber.

Other things we have used:

	- project the image directly into a camera with RGB outputs.

	- dismount the slides and lay them on a flatbed scanner.

	- some scanners are specially setup for transparencies and 35mm slides.

If you need more info, give me a jingle...

Eric Miller
Manager, New Media Systems
Microware Systems Corp.

phil@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Phil Howard KA9WGN) (05/31/91)

ATDYW@ASUACAD.BITNET writes:

>Does anyone out there known of a GOOD way to digitize 35mm slides? I mean
>other than using a vcr-to-digital conversion? I would like to avoid displaying
>the slides, taking pictures and digitizing the pictures. There must be some
>way to do it directly. Any help will be appreciated. <DW>

Nikon makes a 35mm slide digitizer giving you 6144x4096 in 8 planes per color.
The price is in the $7500-$10000 range.
-- 
 /***************************************************************************\
/ Phil Howard -- KA9WGN -- phil@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu   |  Guns don't aim guns at  \
\ Lietuva laisva -- Brivu Latviju -- Eesti vabaks  |  people; CRIMINALS do!!  /
 \***************************************************************************/

vjurgens@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Vincent Jurgens) (06/05/91)

Macworld, June 1991 has a review of flatbed scanners and lists some slide 
scanners.
The Nikon scanner is a very good, hi-resolution, but expensive one.  We 
have one and like it.  But Kodak and Microtek have less expensive models, 
which may work a little faster and do the trick for your application.  
They generate digital files.
Kodaks and others do have the devices which feed built-in cameras, which 
are good, quick and inexpensive if you don't need the resolution and maybe 
already have a frame grabber.