jpage@rruxa.UUCP (J Page) (08/20/87)
Has anyone had any experience converting INGRES EQUEL code to SQL??? It seems like a conversion program could be written but would like to know if one exists in "net land" before we try to write one ourselves. RTI seems reluctant to provide us one (wonder why????). Any help or experiences would be helpful. Thanks in advance. Jim Page ihnp4!bellcore!rruxe!jpage
daveb@llama.rtech.UUCP (Dave Brower) (08/25/87)
In article <289@rruxa.UUCP> jpage@rruxa.UUCP (J Page) writes: > > Has anyone had any experience converting INGRES EQUEL code > to SQL??? > > It seems like a conversion program could be written but would like > to know if one exists in "net land" before we try to write > one ourselves. > > RTI seems reluctant to provide us one (wonder why????). Probably because we don't have one. -dB "I'm no expert, but I play one on the net" {amdahl, cbosgd, mtxinu, ptsfa, sun}!rtech!daveb daveb@rtech.uucp
schung@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Stephen the Greatest) (09/01/87)
QUEL is more powerful than SQL. Reasons: (Behold! All yee IBM people...): - QUEL is *proven* to be funtionally equivalent to the relational algebra. Therefore, anything that can be expressed in the relational algebra can be expressed in QUEL. - QUEL is more consistent in its design (talk to E. Wong about it). In SQL, problems are solved ad hoc instead of being part of the initial design. Stephen :-)