abc@unh.UUCP (Avinash B Chopde) (03/31/88)
Is there any simple way in C-Shell to duplicate the following Bourne Shell command to redirect stdout messages to file1 and stderr messages to file 2 ? $ command 1> file1 2> file2 Right now, I enter the Bourne shell from C-Shell every time I need to do stuff like that. Thanks in advance for any replies. -- Avinash Chopde abc@unhcs.CSNET {.....}!uunet!unh!abc "You're Joking Me!" ==================== (Standard Disclaimer Applies).
karish@denali.UUCP (karish) (03/31/88)
In article <287@unh.UUCP> abc@unh.UUCP (Avinash B Chopde) writes: > >Is there any simple way in C-Shell to duplicate the following >Bourne Shell command to redirect stdout messages to file1 and >stderr messages to file 2 ? > >$ command 1> file1 2> file2 % (command > file1) >& file2 >Avinash Chopde Chuck
sue@encore.UUCP (Sue LoVerso) (03/31/88)
In article <287@unh.UUCP> abc@unh.UUCP (Avinash B Chopde) writes: > >Is there any simple way in C-Shell to duplicate the following >Bourne Shell command to redirect stdout messages to file1 and >stderr messages to file 2 ? > >$ command 1> file1 2> file2 > The simplest way I know of is: % (command > file1) >& file2 Execute the command in a subshell, redirecting its output to file1, and then its stderr output can be redirected at shell level to file2. -- Susan J. LoVerso Encore Computer Corp. sue@multimax.arpa encore!sue
rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) (04/01/88)
In comp.unix.questions (<287@unh.UUCP>), abc@unh.UUCP (Avinash B Chopde) asks for the csh equivalent of the following /bin/sh fragment: $ command 1> file1 2> file2 Gotta use an extra sub-shell: % (command >file1) >& file2 -- Please send comp.sources.unix-related mail to rsalz@uunet.uu.net.
rns@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM (Rick Schubert) (04/01/88)
In article <287@unh.UUCP> abc@unh.UUCP (Avinash B Chopde) writes: > >Is there any simple way in C-Shell to duplicate the following >Bourne Shell command to redirect stdout messages to file1 and >stderr messages to file 2 ? > >$ command 1> file1 2> file2 Try this: % (command > file1) >& file2 This (I believe) causes an extra shell to be executed, so it is less efficient than for the Bourne shell, but it should do what you want.