[comp.unix.questions] New product?

dkelly@npiatl.UUCP (Dwight Kelly) (02/06/90)

Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what
is being introduced?

Invite read:

	Unix users, you are invited to the launch of a very significant
	IBM product.  February 15, 1990.


Dwight Kelly
Network Publications, Inc.
Atlanta, GA

jason@cs.utexas.edu (Jason Martin Levitt) (02/06/90)

In article <749@npiatl.UUCP> dkelly@npiatl.UUCP (Dwight Kelly) writes:
>Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what
>is being introduced?
>
>Invite read:
>
>	Unix users, you are invited to the launch of a very significant
>	IBM product.  February 15, 1990.
>
>
  If you ask an IBM employee, they will say:

        "I don't know what you're talking about."

  If you ask someone who has one of the products, they will say:

        "I can't tell you anything unless you've signed a 
         non-disclosure agreement with IBM."

   If you ask me, I'll say:

        "The Sparcstation I and the DECstation 3100 are very
         significant products."
  
     ---Jason 
-----

Jason Martin Levitt    P.O. Box 49860  Austin, Texas 78765  (512) 459-0055
Internet : jason@cs.utexas.edu            |          I
UUCP     : ...cs.utexas.edu!hackbox!jason |       put the 
BIX      : jlevitt                        |     chic in geek.   

gupta@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (02/06/90)

> Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what
> is being introduced?

My guess is that its their long overdue RIOS workstations...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet:  rohit-gupta@uiuc.edu 	PHONEnet:  217 356 7959	
UUCP: 	   uunet!uiucuxc!ux1!gupta      BITnet:    GUPTA@UIUCVMD
******************************* "E Pluribus UNIX" *****************************

john@newave.UUCP (John A. Weeks III) (02/06/90)

In article <749@npiatl.UUCP> dkelly@npiatl.UUCP (Dwight Kelly) writes:
> Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what
> is being introduced?
>	Unix users, you are invited to the launch of a very significant
>	IBM product.  February 15, 1990.

I wouldn't be too surprised if this was the new PC-RT series that we have
been hearing rumors about for the last 2 years.  If you go, please post
a summary.

If you want a preview, there is an article in PC Week this week.

-john-

-- 
===============================================================================
John A. Weeks III   (612) 942-6969   ...uunet!rosevax!bungia!wd0gol!newave!john
===============================================================================
<***  ***  Disclaimer: Its my machine, so I can say whatever I want.  ***  ***>

kevin@msa3b.UUCP (Kevin P. Kleinfelter) (02/06/90)

dkelly@npiatl.UUCP (Dwight Kelly) writes:

>Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what
>is being introduced?

>Invite read:

>	Unix users, you are invited to the launch of a very significant
>	IBM product.  February 15, 1990.

Based on what I read in the industry rags, it is probably the RIOS
machine (i.e. the RT follow-on).  I am HOPING that they will also announce
that AIX PS/2 1.2 is available.  Release 1.1 is up to 13 update diskettes,
and applying the updates trashed my base OS (can you spell FRUSTRATION...
sure you can...)
-- 
Kevin Kleinfelter @ Management Science America, Inc (404) 239-2347
gatech!nanovx!msa3b!kevin

friedl@mtndew.UUCP (Steve Friedl) (02/08/90)

dkelly@npiatl.UUCP (Dwight Kelly) writes:
>Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what
>is being introduced?

A friend of mine got to see an IBM internal presentation about
their new workstation (the POWER series, some kind of stupid
acryonym), and the Big Product Announcement is supposed to be in
the next week or so.   He and I really like to bash IBM, but my
friend could not contain himself here -- he was totally impressed
with the system.  This is what I recall from the conversation.

IBM did extensive studies of what kinds of instructions were
needed by typical workstation, and they built a superscaler RISC
to match it.  Very high integer and floating point performance,
four or five instructions can execute at one time.

They use the MCA architecture, but they have some kind of mods
that kick up the speed from 40mbyte/second up to over
200mbyte/second (and maybe even higher, I don't recall) depending
on the model.  As much as they hate following standards, they
apparently did so by and large across the board.  NFS, AFS, and
TCP/IP come to mind.

UNIX is supposed to be hybrid of Sys V and Berkeley, with a main
focus on Posix compliance.  20000 pages of "great" documentation
on CD ROM, online manuals, hundreds of hours of UNIX tutorials,
etc.

They already have in the ballpark of a hundred applications
ported (including Frame, for instance) and have signed up many
more to be delivered by the end of the year.  They are setting up
porting centers with these machines plus Suns and DECs and such,
plus smart staff to help with the porting.

Oh, they also admitted explicitly that they blew it totally on
the RT and that if they do it again, nobody will take them
seriously in this market.  My friend says that they have not made
the same mistake again.

It looks like a really hot system.

     Steve

-- 
Stephen J. Friedl, KA8CMY / Software Consultant / Tustin, CA / 3B2-kind-of-guy
+1 714 544 6561 voice   /   friedl@vsi.com   /   {uunet,attmail}!mtndew!friedl

"Winning the Balridge Quality Award is as easy as falling off a horse." - me

kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley) (02/08/90)

In article <335@mtndew.UUCP> friedl@mtndew.UUCP (Steve Friedl) writes:
>dkelly@npiatl.UUCP (Dwight Kelly) writes:
>>Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what

>IBM did extensive studies of what kinds of instructions were
>needed by typical workstation, and they built a superscaler RISC
>to match it.  Very high integer and floating point performance,
>four or five instructions can execute at one time.

What an original idea, only Intel (486), Motorola (68040), and a whole
plethora of other companies have done the same.  Can it truly be that
the company that once said there that there would be no market for photo-
copiers as long as there was carbon paper, is actually getting in on the
band wagon.

Nah, I doubt it!  But then, what do I know?


Chewey, get us outta here!
                 
kaleb@mars.jpl.nasa.gov            Jet Propeller Labs
Kaleb Keithley

reggie@dinsdale.nm.paradyne.com (George W. Leach) (02/08/90)

In article <2772@jato.Jpl.Nasa.Gov> kaleb@mars.UUCP (Kaleb Keithley) writes:
>In article <335@mtndew.UUCP> friedl@mtndew.UUCP (Steve Friedl) writes:
>>dkelly@npiatl.UUCP (Dwight Kelly) writes:
>>>Just got an invitation to an IBM product announcement.  Anyone know what

>>IBM did extensive studies of what kinds of instructions were
>>needed by typical workstation, and they built a superscaler RISC
>>to match it.  Very high integer and floating point performance,
>>four or five instructions can execute at one time.

>What an original idea, only Intel (486), Motorola (68040), and a whole
>plethora of other companies have done the same.  Can it truly be that
>the company that once said there that there would be no market for photo-
>copiers as long as there was carbon paper, is actually getting in on the
>band wagon.

   Actually, IBM was one of the pioneers of the RISC movement. with the
development of the 801 in the 70's.  For details check out the following
reference:



George Radin,
"The 801 Minicomputer",
Proceedings Symposium on Architectural Support for Programming languages
and Operating Systems, March 1-3, 1982, Palo Alto, California, pp. 39-47.
- or -
IBM Journal of Research and Development, 27 (3), May 1983, pp. 237-246.


also see

Robert Berhhard,
"More Hardware Means Less Software",
IEEE Spectrum, 18(12), December 1981, pp. 30-37.

George

George W. Leach					AT&T Paradyne 
(uunet|att)!pdn!reggie				Mail stop LG-133
Phone: 1-813-530-2376				P.O. Box 2826
FAX: 1-813-530-8224				Largo, FL 34649-2826 USA

rcd@ico.isc.com (Dick Dunn) (02/09/90)

friedl@mtndew.UUCP (Steve Friedl) writes:
[...assorted stuff about new product deleted...]
> ...20000 pages of "great" documentation
> on CD ROM,...

Beg pardon?  This is self contradictory...if it's "great", there won't be
20000 pages of it; if it's 20000 pages, it won't be great.  I hope this was
a typo!
-- 
Dick Dunn     rcd@ico.isc.com    uucp: {ncar,nbires}!ico!rcd     (303)449-2870
   ...Mr. Natural says, "Use the right tool for the job."

lbert359@pallas.athenanet.com (Lee Bertagnolli) (02/10/90)

IBM may have coined the term (RISC), but they certainly did not have the
first commercially available systems.  As far back as 1972(!) there was
the Burroughs B1000 series, which was not a RISC machine by the current
definition, but it had only 26 instructions.  There was at least one other
system on the market before that.

To say IBM invented RISC is like saying IBM invented virtual memory.

buck@siswat.UUCP (A. Lester Buck) (02/12/90)

In article <289@pallas.athenanet.com>, lbert359@pallas.athenanet.com (Lee Bertagnolli) writes:
> There was at least one other
> system on the market before that.
> 
> To say IBM invented RISC is like saying IBM invented virtual memory.

I'm no IBM fan, but please don't confuse IBM products with IBM inventions.
Lots of terrific ideas are trapped inside IBM laboratories because of
marketing decisions.  Just ask the RISC manufacturers whether they
have patent cross-licensing with Burroughs or IBM...

-- 
A. Lester Buck     buck@siswat.lonestar.org  ...!texbell!moray!siswat!buck

gupta@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (02/13/90)

In today's Wall Street Journal there is an article about the new
IBM machines (in the Marketplace section). It says that it is
a fast machine and that IBM will be selling it for around $15K. Apparently
the name is RS/6000 (continuing the long IBM tradition of 
user-friendly names :-).

BTW, it also said that IBM invented RISC.


Rohit

bill@bilver.UUCP (Bill Vermillion) (02/13/90)

In article <22000005@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> gupta@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
 
>In today's Wall Street Journal there is an article about the new
>IBM machines (in the Marketplace section). It says that it is
>a fast machine and that IBM will be selling it for around $15K. Apparently
>the name is RS/6000 (continuing the long IBM tradition of 
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>user-friendly names :-).

Interesting choice for a name.  Wonder if they realize Radio Shack had a
series with that number.

I can just see it now.  "Hey I got a new RS 6000".  "That old Radio Shack
Dog!  Why not get a good machine!"

Actually the RS line started with the Radio Shack 16, and it became the Tandy
6000, but a lot of people still say they have a Radio Shack 6000!

-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill@bilver.UUCP

brnstnd@stealth.acf.nyu.edu (02/15/90)

In article <289@pallas.athenanet.com> lbert359@pallas.UUCP (Lee Bertagnolli) writes:
  [ B1000 series were basically RISC: only 26 instructions ]

Let's add the CDC 6600 to this list.

---Dan

phil@aimt.UU.NET (Phil Gustafson) (02/21/90)

In article <289@pallas.athenanet.com>, lbert359@pallas.athenanet.com (Lee Bertagnolli) writes:
> IBM may have coined the term (RISC), but they certainly did not have the
> first commercially available systems.  As far back as 1972(!) there was
> the Burroughs B1000 series..

Another RISCish computer of the day was the Data General Nova.  It had eight
instructions, each modifiable with various skip and other conditions.  It
had a large number of general registers for the era -- four times as many as
the then-competitive DEC processor.  And _all_ arithmetic operations were
register-to-register.

All these characteristics are straight out of the RISC dogma book.


-- 
				Phil Gustafson, Graphics/UN*X Consultant
				{uunet,ames!coherent}!aimt!phil phil@aimt.uu.net
				1550 Martin Ave, San Jose, Ca 95126