andersa@kuling.UUCP (Anders Andersson) (11/08/86)
No doubt the law (maybe with good explanation) makes clear what's legal to export and what's not. What's NOT clear to me is how and when this relates to electronic mail/conferencing (perhaps I should ask the US Embassy about that, but I think it might as well be disputed here). I recall this debate started with somebody posting an article containing encryption software to the world-wide network. Now, WHO was (legally) exporting the stuff? The original poster, or the SA of every relay host actually transmitting it over the border (I don't know the topology of the North American USENET, but I suspect there are several machines in the USA with foreign connections, besides seismo's link to Europe), or perhaps both? What if such a message had originated in Europe and found its way to Canada, *via* the USA? Would that procedure be called "exporting" by the US Dept. of Commerce? Yes, I might as well write a letter to the embassy and ask about this, but as some people has shown their disappointment with certain companies being careful enough to bring the crypt(X) issue to court, I think I'd better ask the net for advice/permission before giving any authority an incentive to start meddling in this unclear field of communication... Well? Besides, it seems that this recently adopted export control law of ours is working. According to the news today, Russian cargo trailers loaded with electronics are piling up, stucked at the customs! :-) -- Anders Andersson, Dept. of Computer Systems, Uppsala University, Sweden Phone: +46 18 183170 UUCP: andersa@kuling.UUCP (...!{seismo,mcvax}!enea!kuling!andersa)